This week the people at the Eurasian Economic Commission database posted a few new Mac models already undisclosed to general society. These model numbers may not really mean a ton to the layman all alone, yet with regards to past Apple equipment, they’re telling. In the blend were the majority of the accompanying: A2141, A2147, A2158, A2159, A2179, A2182, and A2251.
These numbers point toward a lot of new MacBook models – or maybe another MacBook Pro. For the most part Apple has another Mac occasion in October, on the off chance that they have an occasion during the year by any stretch of the imagination. This would fit with a course of events with the codes showing up in the Eurasian Economic Commission database this week – with a touch of testing waiting be done among from time to time.
Data originates from MacRumors toward the beginning of today with a tip about the posting springing up in Russia this week. The date of distribution was June thirteenth, 2019, at 11:14 nearby time. The posting recommended the approaching dispatch of “Portable personal computers of the trademark ‘Apple’” with the model numbers and “programming form macOS 10.14” just as “extra parts for them.
The most essential MacBook line was last refreshed in June of 2017, and could surely utilize a kind of a reboot – or if nothing else an update in specs. The MacBook Pro was simply refreshed this May, 2019 with a fresh out of the box new arrangement of console key forms for the majority.
Maybe most telling here is the ongoing re-prologue to the iOS-to-macOS framework from Apple called Catalyst. This was recently called Marzipan, and should serve to re-strengthen improvement for the working framework one way or the other – beginning this fall.
What we’re crossing our fingers for is a spic and span newly presented Mac Pro Mini. With the new Mac Pro showing up in the entirety of its cheddar grater configuration greatness here in June of 2019, and another macOS in transit, the planning would be spot on the spot.
Disclaimer: The views, suggestions, and opinions expressed here are the sole responsibility of the experts. No Chicago Headlines journalist was involved in the writing and production of this article.